Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

targetconstructionltd.com

Winnipeg Landscape Company with Professional Hardscaping Services

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

118 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

626 ms

About Website

Welcome to targetconstructionltd.com homepage info - get ready to check Targetconstructionltd best content right away, or after learning these important things about targetconstructionltd.com

Winnipeg landscape company specializing hardscaping design including interlocking paving stones, concrete driveways, water features and retaining walls.

Visit targetconstructionltd.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Targetconstructionltd.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

targetconstructionltd.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.253

49/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

targetconstructionltd.com

118 ms

targetconstructionltd.com

667 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

32 ms

styles.css

65 ms

settings.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Targetconstructionltd.com, 7% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (774 ms) belongs to the original domain Targetconstructionltd.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.6 kB (2%)

Content Size

8.9 MB

After Optimization

8.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Targetconstructionltd.com main page is 8.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 183.5 kB

  • Original 222.9 kB
  • After minification 216.2 kB
  • After compression 39.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 7.8 MB
  • After minification 7.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Targetconstructionltd images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 568.0 kB
  • After minification 568.0 kB
  • After compression 558.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 246.9 kB
  • After minification 246.5 kB
  • After compression 242.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Targetconstructionltd.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (61%)

Requests Now

105

After Optimization

41

The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Targetconstructionltd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

targetconstructionltd.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

targetconstructionltd.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Targetconstructionltd.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Targetconstructionltd.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Targetconstructionltd. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: