Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

taylorimplement.com

Taylor Implement Company - New & Used Agricultural Equipment, Service, and Parts in Hoxie, KS, Yuma and Greeley, CO, near Denver, Fort Collins, Hays, ...

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

24 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

662 ms

About Website

Visit taylorimplement.com now to see the best up-to-date Taylor Implement content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about taylorimplement.com

Taylor Implement Company is an agricultural equipment in Hoxie, KS & Yuma and Greeley, CO, featuring Class, Orkel, Gravely, Taylor JCB, Oxbo, Meyer, and Honey Bee. We provide sales, parts, service and...

Visit taylorimplement.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Taylorimplement.com page load time and found that the first response time was 24 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

taylorimplement.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

taylorimplement.com

24 ms

taylorimplement.com

237 ms

www.taylorimplement.com

373 ms

css2

55 ms

bootstrap.min.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Taylorimplement.com, 14% (11 requests) were made to Media.sandhills.com and 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Taylorimplement.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 474.4 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Taylorimplement.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 149.2 kB

  • Original 178.1 kB
  • After minification 172.6 kB
  • After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 302.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 997.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Taylor Implement needs image optimization as it can save up to 302.0 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 284.4 kB
  • After minification 284.4 kB
  • After compression 263.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 103.4 kB
  • After minification 103.4 kB
  • After compression 101.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Taylorimplement.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (64%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Taylor Implement. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

taylorimplement.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

taylorimplement.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

taylorimplement.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Taylorimplement.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Taylorimplement.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Taylor Implement. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: