Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

Page Load Speed

12.1 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

11.8 sec

Page Rendered

219 ms

About Website

Visit team-m.net now to see the best up-to-date Team M content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about team-m.net

MODFATHER LTD

Visit team-m.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Team-m.net page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 12 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

team-m.net performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

team-m.net

46 ms

app.min.1716897647.css

6 ms

custom.240602001838.css

11 ms

app.bundle.1716897655.js

31 ms

custom.240602000441.js

4 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Team-m.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Team-m.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 489.2 kB (58%)

Content Size

848.3 kB

After Optimization

359.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Team-m.net main page is 848.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 406.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 15.1 kB

  • Original 26.9 kB
  • After minification 26.9 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 56% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 19.7 kB

  • Original 216.6 kB
  • After minification 196.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Team M images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 285.7 kB

  • Original 406.9 kB
  • After minification 403.1 kB
  • After compression 121.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 285.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 168.6 kB

  • Original 197.9 kB
  • After minification 196.7 kB
  • After compression 29.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Team-m.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 168.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Team M. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

team-m.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

team-m.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

team-m.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Team-m.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Team-m.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Team M. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: