Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

tecafine.com

Tecafine Polymers Pvt Ltd | pp sheets | hdpe sheets | duct casing pipe spacer | conduit pipe spacer | pp solid sheet | hdpe rod | pp rod manufacturer ...

Page Load Speed

8.5 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

817 ms

About Website

Visit tecafine.com now to see the best up-to-date Tecafine content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tecafine.com

Tecafine Polymers Pvt Ltd Rajkot, gujarat, india pp sheets | hdpe sheets | pp block | hdpe block | pp rod | hdpe rod | high density polyethylene sheet | pp solid sheet | polypropylene solid sheet | hd...

Visit tecafine.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tecafine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tecafine.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.478

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tecafine.com

1936 ms

bootstrap.css

594 ms

style.css

496 ms

styleapp.css

299 ms

responsive.css

201 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Tecafine.com, 12% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Tecafine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (31%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tecafine.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 69.8 kB

  • Original 80.6 kB
  • After minification 60.1 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.6 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 123.5 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tecafine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 399.6 kB

  • Original 683.5 kB
  • After minification 618.5 kB
  • After compression 284.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 399.6 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 548.0 kB

  • Original 633.3 kB
  • After minification 520.2 kB
  • After compression 85.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tecafine.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 548.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (39%)

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

62

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tecafine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

tecafine.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tecafine.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tecafine.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tecafine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tecafine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tecafine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: