Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 33

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

tekstape.com

TEXTAPE PTFE (Teflon) Kaplı Cam Kumaş- TEXTAPE PTFE(Teflon) Kumaş

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

393 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

168 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tekstape content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tekstape.com

TEXTAPE PTFE Teflon Kumaş , Yapışkanlı TEXTAPE PTFE teflon bant ve Konveyör Bant sektörünün lider firması Tekstape Teflon Bant, konveyör bandı imalat ve toptan satışı , konveyor bant sistemleri ile Te...

Visit tekstape.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tekstape.com page load time and found that the first response time was 393 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tekstape.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tekstape.com

393 ms

www.tekstape.com

403 ms

www.tekstape.com

550 ms

js

50 ms

template.css

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Tekstape.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Tekstape.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.5 kB (41%)

Content Size

603.7 kB

After Optimization

357.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tekstape.com main page is 603.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 514.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 25.7 kB
  • After minification 20.7 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 220.2 kB

  • Original 514.2 kB
  • After minification 294.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tekstape needs image optimization as it can save up to 220.2 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 53.4 kB
  • After minification 53.4 kB
  • After compression 49.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 10.4 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tekstape.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (32%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tekstape. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

tekstape.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tekstape.com best practices score

33

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

tekstape.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tekstape.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tekstape.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tekstape. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: