Access tessea.com. TESSEA ≡ Conseil en Durabilité & Transition écologique

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.307

38/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

www.tessea.com

1243 ms

2iqgb.css

228 ms

post-6622.css

244 ms

2iqgb.css

439 ms

post-69.css

304 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Tessea.com, 21% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Tessea.com.

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Tessea.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 99.9 kB

Original 115.7 kB
After minification 113.0 kB
After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 2.1 MB
After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TESSEA images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 295 B

Original 177.5 kB
After minification 177.5 kB
After compression 177.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 721 B

Original 142.5 kB
After minification 142.5 kB
After compression 141.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tessea.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TESSEA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.