Access texomaliving.com. Search every page of every issue published by Texoma Living! Magazine from 2006 to 2010.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.108

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

www.texomaliving.com

885 ms

frontend_blocks.css

61 ms

frontend_blocks_responsive.css

47 ms

style.min.css

92 ms

frontend_blocks__premium_only.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Texomaliving.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (885 ms) belongs to the original domain Texomaliving.com.

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

754.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Texomaliving.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 704.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 45.5 kB

Original 61.7 kB
After minification 59.9 kB
After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 120.7 kB

Original 704.2 kB
After minification 583.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Texoma Living needs image optimization as it can save up to 120.7 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 184.2 kB

Original 271.8 kB
After minification 269.8 kB
After compression 87.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 412.6 kB

Original 479.5 kB
After minification 467.6 kB
After compression 66.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texomaliving.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 412.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texoma Living. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.