Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

textalk.se

Textalk - e-tidningar, e-handel & webshop för alla

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

316 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

281 ms

About Website

Welcome to textalk.se homepage info - get ready to check Textalk best content for Sweden right away, or after learning these important things about textalk.se

E-handelsplattform Abicart för din Webshop. Tillgängliga e-tidningslösningar med Prenly. Publiceringsverktyg, innehållskonvertering. Taltidningar för synskadade

Visit textalk.se

Key Findings

We analyzed Textalk.se page load time and found that the first response time was 316 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

textalk.se performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

textalk.se

316 ms

www.textalk.se

1110 ms

notices.css

305 ms

langswitcher.css

308 ms

glightbox.min.css

316 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Textalk.se, 5% (1 request) were made to Plausible.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Textalk.se.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.8 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Textalk.se main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 47.6 kB

  • Original 57.4 kB
  • After minification 50.0 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 62.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 960.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Textalk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 39 B

  • Original 121.4 kB
  • After minification 121.4 kB
  • After compression 121.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 317 B

  • Original 18.3 kB
  • After minification 18.3 kB
  • After compression 18.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textalk.se has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (42%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

textalk.se accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

textalk.se best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

textalk.se SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    SV

  • Language Claimed

    SV

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textalk.se can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textalk.se main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Textalk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: