Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

thelittlebank.com

Union Bank | First National Bank

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

294 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

179 ms

About Website

Welcome to thelittlebank.com homepage info - get ready to check Thelittle Bank best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about thelittlebank.com

The Little Bank: We Want to Know You - Serving Eastern NC.

Visit thelittlebank.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thelittlebank.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thelittlebank.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value2.289

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.thelittlebank.com

294 ms

style.css

185 ms

textsizer.js

560 ms

scripts.js

719 ms

image_fade.js

148 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Thelittlebank.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (719 ms) belongs to the original domain Thelittlebank.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 268.4 kB (33%)

Content Size

802.5 kB

After Optimization

534.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thelittlebank.com main page is 802.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 429.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 30.8 kB
  • After minification 29.1 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 429.1 kB
  • After minification 412.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thelittle Bank images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 178.3 kB

  • Original 284.3 kB
  • After minification 279.6 kB
  • After compression 106.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 178.3 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 49.8 kB

  • Original 58.3 kB
  • After minification 39.4 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thelittlebank.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (37%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thelittle Bank. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

thelittlebank.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

thelittlebank.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

thelittlebank.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thelittlebank.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thelittlebank.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thelittle Bank. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: