Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

thomasbyrd.com

Thomas Byrd - plumbing, irrigation, septic, wells in NJ

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

72 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

393 ms

About Website

Welcome to thomasbyrd.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomas Byrd best content right away, or after learning these important things about thomasbyrd.com

Thomas Byrd is located in Egg Harbor Township, NJ. We service plumbing, septic, well pumps, wells, septic inspections / certifications and irrigation

Visit thomasbyrd.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thomasbyrd.com page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thomasbyrd.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,130 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.411

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thomasbyrd.com

72 ms

screen.css

23 ms

flexslider.css

40 ms

css

20 ms

css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Thomasbyrd.com, 20% (18 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 7% (6 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-2.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (995 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 102.1 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Thomasbyrd.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 41.9 kB
  • After minification 39.5 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Byrd images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 45.1 kB

  • Original 252.9 kB
  • After minification 252.8 kB
  • After compression 207.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 8.2 kB
  • After minification 8.2 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomasbyrd.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 50% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (52%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Byrd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

thomasbyrd.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

thomasbyrd.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

thomasbyrd.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomasbyrd.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Thomasbyrd.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomas Byrd. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: