Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

thomassawmill.com

Home Page

Page Load Speed

812 ms in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

466 ms

Page Rendered

205 ms

About Website

Welcome to thomassawmill.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomassawmill best content right away, or after learning these important things about thomassawmill.com

Frank Thomas Sawmill is a family-owned and operated business that was started in 1933 during the Great Depression.

Visit thomassawmill.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thomassawmill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 671 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thomassawmill.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thomassawmill.com

141 ms

7226005.png

22 ms

Frank_Thomas_Title_1.jpg

57 ms

index.1.jpg

104 ms

index.2.jpg

122 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Thomassawmill.com, 22% (2 requests) were made to Inkjetdeals.info and 11% (1 request) were made to Cb.amazingcounters.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (273 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomassawmill.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.7 kB (3%)

Content Size

593.4 kB

After Optimization

574.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Thomassawmill.com main page is 593.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 585.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 7.1 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 585.8 kB
  • After minification 572.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomassawmill images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

  • Images

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomassawmill. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

thomassawmill.com accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

thomassawmill.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

thomassawmill.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomassawmill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomassawmill.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomassawmill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: