Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ticktockwatch.co.uk

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

484 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

838 ms

About Website

Welcome to ticktockwatch.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Ticktockwatch best content right away, or after learning these important things about ticktockwatch.co.uk

Free UK delivery and worldwide shipping. Official stockist of leading designer brands. Hassle Free Returns. Pay Later with Klarna.

Visit ticktockwatch.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Ticktockwatch.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 484 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ticktockwatch.co.uk performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,620 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.441

21/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ticktockwatch.co.uk

484 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

194 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

202 ms

ion.range-slider.css

203 ms

shortcodes.css

217 ms

Our browser made a total of 135 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Ticktockwatch.co.uk, 12% (16 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.shopify.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 426.2 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ticktockwatch.co.uk main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 312.4 kB

  • Original 355.8 kB
  • After minification 248.8 kB
  • After compression 43.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 107.0 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 312.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ticktockwatch images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 425.9 kB
  • After minification 418.6 kB
  • After compression 348.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 28.9 kB

  • Original 133.6 kB
  • After minification 133.6 kB
  • After compression 104.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ticktockwatch.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 78 (64%)

Requests Now

121

After Optimization

43

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 121 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ticktockwatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 59 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ticktockwatch.co.uk accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ticktockwatch.co.uk best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ticktockwatch.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ticktockwatch.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ticktockwatch.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ticktockwatch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: