Access tigerbalm.de. Die Kraft der fernöstlichen Heilkunst im Überblick

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.181

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.7 s

1/100

10%

tigerbalm.de

114 ms

www.tigerbalm.de

67 ms

gtm.js

90 ms

matomo.js

536 ms

merged-9d24fbdf75da85d7776f6501b393af29-d3e40aaf8e3d6d3dd3ac5fb6d1465d6f.js

350 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerbalm.de, 3% (2 requests) were made to Analytics.queisser.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Tigerbalm.de.

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Tigerbalm.de main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 93.1 kB

Original 109.2 kB
After minification 106.5 kB
After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

Original 1.3 MB
After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tiger Balm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 25.2 kB

Original 162.1 kB
After minification 162.1 kB
After compression 136.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.2 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 54.4 kB

Original 193.4 kB
After minification 193.4 kB
After compression 139.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerbalm.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tiger Balm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.