Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

tigerbill.com

Contact Information for TigerBill's DrumBeat Support.

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

139 ms

Resources Loaded

714 ms

Page Rendered

461 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tiger Bill content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tigerbill.com

Contact Information for TigerBill's DrumBeat Support.

Visit tigerbill.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tigerbill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tigerbill.com performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.259

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tigerbill.com

139 ms

tigerbill.com

225 ms

Level3_Arial_Text.css

22 ms

cse.js

61 ms

js

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerbill.com, 32% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Cse.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (225 ms) belongs to the original domain Tigerbill.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

517.0 kB

After Optimization

428.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tigerbill.com main page is 517.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 255.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 43.1 kB

  • Original 55.5 kB
  • After minification 50.4 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 255.6 kB
  • After minification 247.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tiger Bill images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 962 B

  • Original 162.2 kB
  • After minification 162.2 kB
  • After compression 161.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 36.0 kB

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 31.1 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerbill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (24%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tiger Bill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

tigerbill.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tigerbill.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

tigerbill.com SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigerbill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tigerbill.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tiger Bill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: