Access tigerprocess.com. TIGER PROCESS, technique et implantation de matériel de soudage manuel, automatique et avec robots

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

tigerprocess.com

691 ms

jcemediabox.css

215 ms

style.css

191 ms

mootools-core.js

378 ms

core.js

269 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerprocess.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (910 ms) belongs to the original domain Tigerprocess.com.

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

531.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Tigerprocess.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 570.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 40.4 kB

Original 48.3 kB
After minification 46.1 kB
After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 42.7 kB

Original 375.2 kB
After minification 332.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, TIGER PROCESS needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 390.9 kB

Original 570.5 kB
After minification 539.4 kB
After compression 179.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 390.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 72.0 kB

Original 83.9 kB
After minification 65.7 kB
After compression 11.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerprocess.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TIGER PROCESS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.