Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

tigersteel.net

Tiger Steel - Complete solution for structural steel industry

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

514 ms

Resources Loaded

6.3 sec

Page Rendered

793 ms

About Website

Welcome to tigersteel.net homepage info - get ready to check Tiger Steel best content right away, or after learning these important things about tigersteel.net

We aim to become the integrated structural steel solution provider for the region, our diverse range of services being permanently adapted to tailor-made packages that specifically identify and respon...

Visit tigersteel.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Tigersteel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 514 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tigersteel.net performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tigersteel.net

514 ms

jquery-1.5.2.min.js

486 ms

swfobject.js

468 ms

flexcrollstyles.css

472 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

481 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (105 requests) were addressed to the original Tigersteel.net, 4% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Tigersteel.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 122.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Tigersteel.net main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 38.6 kB

  • Original 47.8 kB
  • After minification 36.5 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.2 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 60.8 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tiger Steel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 396.2 kB
  • After minification 396.2 kB
  • After compression 381.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 73.1 kB
  • After minification 73.1 kB
  • After compression 64.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigersteel.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (68%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tiger Steel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tigersteel.net accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

tigersteel.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tigersteel.net SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigersteel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tigersteel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tiger Steel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: