Access tigertiger.com. Tiger Tiger | Imports from Southeast Asia & the Himalayas

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,230 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.3 s

0/100

10%

tigertiger.com

144 ms

tiger-tiger.com

356 ms

main.min.css

29 ms

index-467dde24.css

24 ms

index-2a7d8588.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tigertiger.com, 81% (93 requests) were made to Tiger-tiger.com and 13% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (465 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Tigertiger.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 100.3 kB

Original 123.3 kB
After minification 115.2 kB
After compression 23.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 78.4 kB

Original 3.3 MB
After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tiger images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 338.6 kB

Original 970.1 kB
After minification 969.6 kB
After compression 631.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 338.6 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

Original 185.8 kB
After minification 183.6 kB
After compression 168.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigertiger.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tiger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.