Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

tmu.in

Personalized Emails & URLs

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

295 ms

Resources Loaded

854 ms

Page Rendered

282 ms

About Website

Welcome to tmu.in homepage info - get ready to check Tmu best content right away, or after learning these important things about tmu.in

Personalized Emails & URLs

Visit tmu.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Tmu.in page load time and found that the first response time was 295 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tmu.in performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value800 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tmu.in

295 ms

email

85 ms

v0.js

47 ms

amp-consent-0.1.js

60 ms

amp-analytics-0.1.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tmu.in, 33% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org and 22% (2 requests) were made to Jupiterin.swipepages.media. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (295 ms) belongs to the original domain Tmu.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 198.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

342.2 kB

After Optimization

143.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Tmu.in main page is 342.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 341.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 180 B

  • Original 416 B
  • After minification 416 B
  • After compression 236 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 180 B or 43% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 198.3 kB

  • Original 341.7 kB
  • After minification 341.7 kB
  • After compression 143.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.3 kB or 58% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tmu. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

tmu.in accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

tmu.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tmu.in SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tmu.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Tmu.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tmu. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: