Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

tomssl.com

TomSSL - Security, Privacy, Cloud Architecture, Random Esoterica

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

241 ms

About Website

Welcome to tomssl.com homepage info - get ready to check TomSSL best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about tomssl.com

by Tom Chantler, a cloud architect who likes writing about anything that interests him and who likes solving difficult problems as efficiently as possible.

Visit tomssl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tomssl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tomssl.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tomssl.com

63 ms

tomssl.com

642 ms

css2

31 ms

css2

18 ms

portal.min.js

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Tomssl.com, 20% (6 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (642 ms) belongs to the original domain Tomssl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.0 kB (16%)

Content Size

679.8 kB

After Optimization

569.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Tomssl.com main page is 679.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 515.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 108.1 kB

  • Original 137.4 kB
  • After minification 132.8 kB
  • After compression 29.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 515.5 kB
  • After minification 513.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TomSSL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 62 B

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 22.7 kB
  • After compression 22.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 4.3 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tomssl.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TomSSL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tomssl.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

tomssl.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tomssl.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tomssl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tomssl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TomSSL. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: