Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

trafficsign.us

Manual of Traffic Signs

Page Load Speed

714 ms in total

First Response

123 ms

Resources Loaded

492 ms

Page Rendered

99 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Traffic Sign content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trafficsign.us

This is a comprehensive listing of the most commonly used traffic signs in the United States.

Visit trafficsign.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Trafficsign.us page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 591 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trafficsign.us performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trafficsign.us

123 ms

mots800.gif

54 ms

moeurginfooter800.gif

106 ms

regsignred.gif

108 ms

warnsignylw.gif

108 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Trafficsign.us and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (368 ms) belongs to the original domain Trafficsign.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.6 kB (64%)

Content Size

13.4 kB

After Optimization

4.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Trafficsign.us main page is 13.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 11.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 11.0 kB
  • After minification 10.6 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 329 B

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Traffic Sign needs image optimization as it can save up to 329 B or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (18%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Traffic Sign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

trafficsign.us accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

trafficsign.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

trafficsign.us SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trafficsign.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Trafficsign.us main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Traffic Sign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: