Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

trevorgilligan.com

Log into Facebook

Page Load Speed

686 ms in total

First Response

312 ms

Resources Loaded

315 ms

Page Rendered

59 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Trevorgilligan content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trevorgilligan.com

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

Visit trevorgilligan.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Trevorgilligan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 312 ms and then it took 374 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trevorgilligan.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trevorgilligan.com

312 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Trevorgilligan.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (312 ms) belongs to the original domain Trevorgilligan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 450.1 kB (67%)

Content Size

676.6 kB

After Optimization

226.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Trevorgilligan.com main page is 676.6 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 311.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 80 B

  • Original 254 B
  • After minification 220 B
  • After compression 174 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34 B, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80 B or 31% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 183.3 kB

  • Original 311.3 kB
  • After minification 128.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trevorgilligan needs image optimization as it can save up to 183.3 kB or 59% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 124.5 kB

  • Original 190.7 kB
  • After minification 172.0 kB
  • After compression 66.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 142.2 kB

  • Original 174.3 kB
  • After minification 171.2 kB
  • After compression 32.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trevorgilligan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 142.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

trevorgilligan.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

trevorgilligan.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

trevorgilligan.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trevorgilligan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Trevorgilligan.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trevorgilligan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: