Access tritarp.com. Tarps, Tarp Systems, Service & Cargo Control

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,420 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.8 s

1/100

10%

www.tritarp.com

752 ms

css

44 ms

style.min.css

64 ms

styles.css

120 ms

theme_css_vars.css

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Tritarp.com, 17% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (994 ms) belongs to the original domain Tritarp.com.

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Tritarp.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 109.7 kB

Original 132.7 kB
After minification 129.9 kB
After compression 23.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

Original 1.8 MB
After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tri Tarp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 224.5 kB

Original 973.7 kB
After minification 973.7 kB
After compression 749.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

Original 298.9 kB
After minification 297.9 kB
After compression 289.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tritarp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tri Tarp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.