Access trivago.dk. trivago.dk - Compare hotel prices worldwide

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value14,800 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.4 s

0/100

10%

trivago.dk

368 ms

pageCheck

15029 ms

tailwind-ltr-953636117398558.css

130 ms

e6f2ac4a704de359.css

134 ms

42403320434a964e.css

133 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Trivago.dk, 39% (24 requests) were made to Imgcy.trivago.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15 sec) belongs to the original domain Trivago.dk.

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

819.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Trivago.dk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 392.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 301.5 kB

Original 369.0 kB
After minification 368.7 kB
After compression 67.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 301.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 860 B

Original 322.0 kB
After minification 321.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trivago images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 558 B

Original 392.2 kB
After minification 392.2 kB
After compression 391.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

Original 48.5 kB
After minification 48.4 kB
After compression 38.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trivago.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trivago. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.