Access triwacko.com. #1 SEO Company for All Size of Businesses

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value30.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

triwacko.com

19795 ms

frontend.min.css

227 ms

css

38 ms

pa-frontend-3a7ff61b2.min.css

165 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

252 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Triwacko.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Triwacko.com.

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

744.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Triwacko.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 523.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 169.8 kB

Original 201.0 kB
After minification 196.1 kB
After compression 31.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 169.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

Original 523.8 kB
After minification 496.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Triwacko images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 37.2 kB

Original 178.9 kB
After minification 178.9 kB
After compression 141.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

Original 101.1 kB
After minification 101.1 kB
After compression 75.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Triwacko.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Triwacko. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.