Access tuktuknaperville.com. Tuk Tuk Naperville

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value37.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,280 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value39.7 s

0/100

10%

www.tuktuknaperville.com

128 ms

ylmQlAUG57GbA5as9U2rjG7KBxNzCwQVZT3enPVDPxSfe7JIfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWDjXwRg8wQbXjQbuZejhwhZKFDycjQ485s7nMkG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0SaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdP37O1sydci8Sc80ZPuKScNRjhNC-PXaFWgcO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8ifUySkolZPUCdhFydeyzSabCSaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUXjAo1ZW4Tdc9lj14zjhFzdeqlFDm3ZKoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCiYmniYmndcB3ZW4h-AUCZPoRdhXCiaiaOcBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8ifUaiaS0jWw0dA9CiaiaO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8ShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCiaiaO1sydci8Sc80ZPuKScNRjhNC-PXaFWgcO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUaiaS0iYmniYmndcB3ZW4h-AUCZPoRdhXKBco8iA9l-eBySku1ScNXZWFnOWs8pYb7f6RblMJbMg6IJMJ7f6R9lMJbMg6YJMJ7f6RslMJbMg65JMJ7f6RmlMJbMg6sJMHbMZkNnEJe.js

73 ms

css2

72 ms

legacy.js

65 ms

modern.js

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tuktuknaperville.com, 40% (16 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 23% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (500 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Content Size

12.3 MB

After Optimization

11.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Tuktuknaperville.com main page is 12.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 212.6 kB

Original 245.4 kB
After minification 221.4 kB
After compression 32.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 212.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 201.1 kB

Original 11.1 MB
After minification 10.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tuk Naperville images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

Original 980.6 kB
After minification 980.6 kB
After compression 976.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

Original 19.2 kB
After minification 19.2 kB
After compression 16.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tuktuknaperville.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tuk Naperville. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.