Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

tuneurl.com

TuneURL - interactive audio with metrics on engagement | TuneURL - interactive audio with metrics on engagement

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

521 ms

About Website

Welcome to tuneurl.com homepage info - get ready to check TuneURL best content right away, or after learning these important things about tuneurl.com

Creating a closer, seamless relationship between host and listener. TuneURL technology provides an interactive experience for the listener. At the same time, capturing more data and metrics on listene...

Visit tuneurl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tuneurl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tuneurl.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tuneurl.com

128 ms

tuneurl.com

212 ms

font-faces

53 ms

_slug_.DRucoN3X.css

120 ms

logo_4096_2304-AoPnabznMoC8yapg.png

496 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Tuneurl.com, 29% (2 requests) were made to Images.unsplash.com and 14% (1 request) were made to Cdn.zyrosite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Images.unsplash.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.4 kB (2%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Tuneurl.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 84.5 kB

  • Original 101.6 kB
  • After minification 99.0 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 4.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TuneURL images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5 B

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 26.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tuneurl.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TuneURL. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

tuneurl.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

tuneurl.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

tuneurl.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuneurl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tuneurl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TuneURL. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: