Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

underseawalk.mu

Solar UnderseaWalk Mauritius Helmet Diving Walk under the sea Mauritius

Page Load Speed

19 sec in total

First Response

8 sec

Resources Loaded

10.3 sec

Page Rendered

717 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Undersea Walk content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about underseawalk.mu

Underseawalk Ltd were the pioneers of helmet diving in 1988 in Mauritius and developed the first solar helmet diving seawalk in the world in 2000.

Visit underseawalk.mu

Key Findings

We analyzed Underseawalk.mu page load time and found that the first response time was 8 sec and then it took 11 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

underseawalk.mu performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,480 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.188

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

underseawalk.mu

7983 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

29 ms

styles.css

336 ms

cuteslider.css

51 ms

settings.css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Underseawalk.mu, 10% (10 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8 sec) belongs to the original domain Underseawalk.mu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 215.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

6.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Underseawalk.mu main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 53.1 kB

  • Original 65.4 kB
  • After minification 63.5 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 5.8 MB
  • After minification 5.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Undersea Walk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 97.5 kB

  • Original 528.6 kB
  • After minification 524.9 kB
  • After compression 431.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.5 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 217.1 kB
  • After minification 216.5 kB
  • After compression 172.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Underseawalk.mu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (70%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Undersea Walk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

underseawalk.mu accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

High

Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

underseawalk.mu best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

underseawalk.mu SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Underseawalk.mu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Underseawalk.mu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Undersea Walk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: