Access universalscale.com. Prompt Reliable Scale Service, On-Site Sales & Repair

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.599

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

50/100

10%

www.universalscale.com

471 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

58 ms

jquery-ui.css

11 ms

form.min.css

65 ms

style.css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Universalscale.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (471 ms) belongs to the original domain Universalscale.com.

Content Size

651.6 kB

After Optimization

593.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Universalscale.com main page is 651.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 353.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

Original 27.0 kB
After minification 25.8 kB
After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

Original 241.0 kB
After minification 239.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Universal Scale images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

Original 353.2 kB
After minification 353.2 kB
After compression 319.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

Original 30.5 kB
After minification 30.5 kB
After compression 27.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Universalscale.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Universal Scale. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.