Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

202 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

About Website

Welcome to upsidedownfoot.com homepage info - get ready to check Upsidedownfoot best content right away, or after learning these important things about upsidedownfoot.com

Visit upsidedownfoot.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Upsidedownfoot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

upsidedownfoot.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.upsidedownfoot.com

202 ms

style.min.css

50 ms

style.min.css

100 ms

dynamic-styles.css

63 ms

sinatra.min.js

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Upsidedownfoot.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (202 ms) belongs to the original domain Upsidedownfoot.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 45.5 kB (45%)

Content Size

101.2 kB

After Optimization

55.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Upsidedownfoot.com main page is 101.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 70.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 25.7 kB
  • After minification 24.8 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 5.2 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 25.1 kB

  • Original 70.3 kB
  • After minification 70.3 kB
  • After compression 45.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Upsidedownfoot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.1 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Upsidedownfoot. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

upsidedownfoot.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Best Practices

upsidedownfoot.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

upsidedownfoot.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Upsidedownfoot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Upsidedownfoot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Upsidedownfoot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: