Access uro.ru. Оборудование для урологии для практикующих урологов. Урологические расходные материалы

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.244

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

uro.ru

483 ms

uro.ru

864 ms

style.css

151 ms

simple-adaptive-slider.min.css

289 ms

scripts.js

702 ms

Our browser made a total of 156 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (122 requests) were addressed to the original Uro.ru, 6% (9 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Leadback.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Uro.ru.

Content Size

5.7 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Uro.ru main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 317.5 kB

Original 398.6 kB
After minification 371.0 kB
After compression 81.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 317.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 815.9 kB

Original 4.4 MB
After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Uro needs image optimization as it can save up to 815.9 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 70.1 kB

Original 596.9 kB
After minification 596.9 kB
After compression 526.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 50.0 kB

Original 234.6 kB
After minification 234.6 kB
After compression 184.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Uro.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Now

151

After Optimization

123

The browser has sent 151 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Uro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.