Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

utilityengineers.net

Gas ACR Air Compressor Spare Parts manufacturers in Mumbai India

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

614 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

412 ms

About Website

Welcome to utilityengineers.net homepage info - get ready to check Utilityengineers best content right away, or after learning these important things about utilityengineers.net

We are Gas Compressor spare parts, ACR Compressor spare parts, Air Compressor spare parts and replacement spare parts manufacturer, supplier in Mumbai, India

Visit utilityengineers.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Utilityengineers.net page load time and found that the first response time was 614 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

utilityengineers.net performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.199

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

utilityengineers.net

614 ms

utilityengineers.net

1081 ms

bootstrap.min.css

501 ms

style.css

736 ms

media.css

744 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Utilityengineers.net, 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Utilityengineers.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 298.9 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Utilityengineers.net main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 41.4 kB

  • Original 46.8 kB
  • After minification 32.0 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.9 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 203.6 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Utilityengineers needs image optimization as it can save up to 203.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 30.7 kB

  • Original 99.8 kB
  • After minification 99.8 kB
  • After compression 69.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.7 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 52.6 kB
  • After minification 41.8 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Utilityengineers.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (29%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

39

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Utilityengineers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

utilityengineers.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

utilityengineers.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

utilityengineers.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF=8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Utilityengineers.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Utilityengineers.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf=8. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Utilityengineers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: