Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

vaibham.com

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

872 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

151 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vaibham content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vaibham.com

Account Services Firm offers Accountancy, Payroll Processing for Foreign Companies, Management Information System, Direct & Indirect Taxation, Management/ System Audits, Foreign Investment in India, L...

Visit vaibham.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vaibham.com page load time and found that the first response time was 872 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vaibham.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vaibham.com

872 ms

grid.css

291 ms

style.css

565 ms

camera.css

579 ms

owl-carousel.css

586 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Vaibham.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Vaibham.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.8 kB (9%)

Content Size

352.0 kB

After Optimization

321.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vaibham.com main page is 352.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 212.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 45% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 212.2 kB
  • After minification 210.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vaibham images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 105.1 kB
  • After minification 105.1 kB
  • After compression 95.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 13.2 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vaibham.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (62%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vaibham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

vaibham.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vaibham.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vaibham.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vaibham.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Vaibham.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vaibham. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: