Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

vaiw.org

Why Should You Go For Fatcow Hosting?

Page Load Speed

671 ms in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

411 ms

Page Rendered

187 ms

About Website

Visit vaiw.org now to see the best up-to-date Vaiw content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vaiw.org

Why choose fatcow hosting? Read this review to know about Fatcow, one of the best and cheap web hosting companies in the industry today.

Visit vaiw.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Vaiw.org page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 598 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vaiw.org performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vaiw.org

73 ms

style.css

60 ms

style.min.css

130 ms

styles.css

130 ms

frontend.min.js

133 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Vaiw.org, 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (160 ms) belongs to the original domain Vaiw.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 12.8 kB (13%)

Content Size

96.7 kB

After Optimization

83.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Vaiw.org main page is 96.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 70.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 17.4 kB
  • After minification 16.2 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 66% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 834 B

  • Original 70.9 kB
  • After minification 70.9 kB
  • After compression 70.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 489 B

  • Original 8.3 kB
  • After minification 8.3 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vaiw.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (71%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vaiw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vaiw.org accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

vaiw.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vaiw.org SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vaiw.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vaiw.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vaiw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: