Access valentinejames.net. Digital. Practical. Catalyst.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

valentinejames.net

178 ms

www.valentinejames.net

389 ms

style.min.css

136 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

189 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Valentinejames.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (677 ms) belongs to the original domain Valentinejames.net.

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Valentinejames.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 40.9 kB

Original 52.7 kB
After minification 51.8 kB
After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 603.5 kB

Original 1.7 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Valentine James needs image optimization as it can save up to 603.5 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 30.1 kB

Original 231.2 kB
After minification 229.7 kB
After compression 201.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 27.0 kB

Original 103.5 kB
After minification 103.4 kB
After compression 76.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Valentinejames.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.0 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Valentine James. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.