Access valentinovamp.com. Valentino Vamp

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.589

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

www.valentinovamp.com

363 ms

pre_tumblelog.js

6 ms

tumblelog_post_message_queue.js

5 ms

index.js

45 ms

canvas.jpg

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Valentinovamp.com, 32% (15 requests) were made to Assets.tumblr.com and 17% (8 requests) were made to 41.media.tumblr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (958 ms) relates to the external source Readtheprintedword.org.

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Valentinovamp.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 73.4 kB

Original 85.0 kB
After minification 70.7 kB
After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 59.7 kB

Original 1.4 MB
After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Valentino Vamp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 319.1 kB

Original 491.3 kB
After minification 491.3 kB
After compression 172.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 319.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Valentino Vamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.