Access vanamconstruction.com. Home

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

vanamconstruction.com

73 ms

vanamconstruction.com

848 ms

gtm.js

116 ms

ubm6agf.css

73 ms

tailwind.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Vanamconstruction.com, 16% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 7% (3 requests) were made to Securepubads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (848 ms) belongs to the original domain Vanamconstruction.com.

Content Size

5.1 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Vanamconstruction.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 46.9 kB

Original 61.5 kB
After minification 50.1 kB
After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 547.9 kB

Original 4.9 MB
After minification 4.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Van Am Construction needs image optimization as it can save up to 547.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 769 B

Original 76.8 kB
After minification 76.8 kB
After compression 76.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 30 B

Original 9.9 kB
After minification 9.9 kB
After compression 9.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vanamconstruction.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Van Am Construction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.