Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

vendorpedia.com

Third-Party Risk Management | Products | OneTrust

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

About Website

Visit vendorpedia.com now to see the best up-to-date Vendorpedia content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vendorpedia.com

Build, scale, and automate your third-party risk management (TPRM) program to earn trust and maintain business continuity over time.

Visit vendorpedia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vendorpedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vendorpedia.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vendorpedia.com

37 ms

vendorpedia.com

130 ms

59 ms

clientlib-base.lc-bacbf913fde1d23e4a2e3cc2d808df6b-lc.min.css

75 ms

clientlib-jquery.lc-76a92234952929ebefaa60dd43afeddb-lc.min.js

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Vendorpedia.com, 75% (44 requests) were made to Onetrust.com and 15% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Onetrust.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

959.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Vendorpedia.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 879.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 92.3 kB

  • Original 108.6 kB
  • After minification 108.5 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 879.2 kB
  • After minification 855.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vendorpedia images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 87.4 kB
  • After minification 87.4 kB
  • After compression 87.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (30%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vendorpedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vendorpedia.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

vendorpedia.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

vendorpedia.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vendorpedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vendorpedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vendorpedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: