Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

vevafilters.com

Amazon.com: VEVA

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

651 ms

Page Rendered

711 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing VEVA Filters content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vevafilters.com

Veva air purifier, filter and vacuum bags

Visit vevafilters.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vevafilters.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vevafilters.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,810 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.458

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value38.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vevafilters.com

66 ms

70FEAA80-D7A5-4AB6-B196-5330300B5114

311 ms

11EIQ5IGqaL._RC%7C01e5ncglxyL.css,01lF2n-pPaL.css,412sHz-V95L.css,31ASPyl+r4L.css,01GZEvC5WIL.css,11GEPqXartL.css,01qPl4hxayL.css,01ti0q+221L.css,413Vvv3GONL.css,11TIuySqr6L.css,01Rw4F+QU6L.css,115C34M4eKL.css,01DwiCRvNnL.css,01IdKcBuAdL.css,01dRHIoUjnL.css,21PrVsc9jNL.css,01oDR3IULNL.css,51nGGGD9eHL.css,01XPHJk60-L.css,11yW2wLgbZL.css,01QhqFH8I8L.css,21ZD1QLZ9FL.css,11JRZ3s9niL.css,21wA+jAxKjL.css,112NH+U6IxL.css,218hqIz39PL.css,01CFUgsA-YL.css,31Q6Yb4SLEL.css,116t+WD27UL.css,11uWFHlOmWL.css,11iezfFGyHL.css,11otOAnaYoL.css,01iEw2pcRVL.css,01X+Gu6WK9L.css,21L02xAJfDL.css,116NcDlHDOL.css,01LzHhtXxxL.css,214tZeCEi5L.css,11F00c3NoYL.css,11hvENnYNUL.css,11FRI-QT39L.css,01890+Vwk8L.css,01864Lq457L.css,01cbS3UK11L.css,21F85am0yFL.css,016mfgi+D2L.css,01WslS8q5ML.css,111YFRAP2PL.css,016Sx2kF1+L.css_.css

30 ms

41-WpIOxHtL._RC%7C71sUoCErROL.css,51q0bIrdFDL.css,110cRm1b1WL.css,119KcSi-BAL.css,31-P1-9TebL.css,31YZpDCYJPL.css,21pkK7OQMnL.css,41EtvNY2OrL.css,110Nj+wUGYL.css,31OvHRW+XiL.css,01R53xsjpjL.css,11EKggV-DlL.css,415g7iDx4VL.css,11qTzxZ0Y5L.css_.css

50 ms

21-Y4XCR2QL.css

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vevafilters.com, 59% (20 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com and 18% (6 requests) were made to Images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (311 ms) relates to the external source Amazon.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (46%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vevafilters.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 213.6 kB

  • Original 316.6 kB
  • After minification 310.5 kB
  • After compression 103.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 213.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 46.0 kB

  • Original 203.2 kB
  • After minification 157.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, VEVA Filters needs image optimization as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 563.8 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 896.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 563.8 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 330.6 kB

  • Original 507.5 kB
  • After minification 507.1 kB
  • After compression 176.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vevafilters.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 330.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (56%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VEVA Filters. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

vevafilters.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

vevafilters.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

vevafilters.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vevafilters.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vevafilters.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of VEVA Filters. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: