Access videoguard.ru. Тепловизоры и системы безопасности, тепловизионные системы видеонаблюдения, тепловизоры дальнего рад...

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

videoguard.ru

497 ms

www.videoguard.ru

518 ms

defs.js

126 ms

klayers.js

255 ms

swfobject.js

253 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Videoguard.ru, 3% (1 request) were made to Counter.yadro.ru and 3% (1 request) were made to Me-talk.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (883 ms) belongs to the original domain Videoguard.ru.

Content Size

588.0 kB

After Optimization

400.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Videoguard.ru main page is 588.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 372.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 29.2 kB

Original 35.3 kB
After minification 33.8 kB
After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 25.2 kB

Original 372.6 kB
After minification 347.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videoguard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 120.4 kB

Original 164.4 kB
After minification 158.5 kB
After compression 44.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

Original 15.7 kB
After minification 13.9 kB
After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videoguard.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videoguard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.