Access videospace.co. Videospace - The Next Generation of Video Intelligence -

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,340 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.103

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.0 s

1/100

10%

videospace.co

81 ms

kpbzm7wdJvENGWei53GEbv4SUfo3Ld1twlsfRdnoi29fenCIfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9hjh4qFQ6XwcZ8wQwUFQB8wQgqZRID5gnvMKG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0SaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdP37O1ZTZemzSagyjhmRdkoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCjAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCjAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCjWw0dA9CdeNRjAUGdaFXOYFUiABkZWF3jAF8ShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCic8qZANDSeBRZPoRdkUh-As8daF3jAF8jhv0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOYiaikoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCiaiaOcBDOcu8OYiaikoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOYiaikoh-As8daF3jAF8OcFzOYiaikoh-As8daF3jAF8jhv0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicIKIcBqdh48OAiyScBldhoqOWgkdkG4f5J7IMMjMkMfH6qJn3IbMg6IJMJ7fbKlMsMMeMj6MKG4fJCgIMMjgkMfH6qJn6IbMg6bJMJ7fbKwMsMMegI6MKG4fVwXIMIjgfMfH6qJv2bbMs6YJMJ7fbRkFgMgeMt6MKG4fVIXIMIjIPMfqMYKv0aagb.js

52 ms

legacy.js

44 ms

modern.js

48 ms

extract-css-runtime-ee9a7b7384ee1f3be597-min.en-US.js

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Videospace.co, 34% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 28% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (285 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Videospace.co main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 68.5 kB

Original 82.6 kB
After minification 67.5 kB
After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

Original 52.1 kB
After minification 47.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videospace images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

Original 2.0 MB
After minification 2.0 MB
After compression 975.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 52% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videospace. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.