Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

viewedit.com

Vidyard - Video Tools for Virtual Sales and Marketing Teams

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

495 ms

Page Rendered

3.6 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Viewedit content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about viewedit.com

Vidyard is an online video platform for business which allows you to increase leads, accelerate your pipeline and delight your customers. Learn more!

Visit viewedit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Viewedit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

viewedit.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,690 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

viewedit.com

9 ms

viewedit.com

13 ms

www.vidyard.com

27 ms

v4.js

202 ms

jquery.min.js

134 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Viewedit.com, 72% (36 requests) were made to Vidyard.com and 14% (7 requests) were made to Play.vidyard.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (322 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 430.3 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

663.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Viewedit.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 510.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 429.2 kB

  • Original 510.9 kB
  • After minification 510.9 kB
  • After compression 81.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 429.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 705 B

  • Original 462.2 kB
  • After minification 461.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Viewedit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 316 B

  • Original 120.9 kB
  • After minification 120.9 kB
  • After compression 120.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (31%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Viewedit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

viewedit.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

viewedit.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

viewedit.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Viewedit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Viewedit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Viewedit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: