Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

vimacare.com

vimacare.com - vimacare Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

179 ms in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

56 ms

Page Rendered

74 ms

About Website

Visit vimacare.com now to see the best up-to-date Vimacare content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vimacare.com

vimacare.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, vimacare.com has it all. We hope you find w...

Visit vimacare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vimacare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 130 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vimacare.com performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vimacare.com

49 ms

beNuBJtKD.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Vimacare.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (49 ms) belongs to the original domain Vimacare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

873.5 kB

After Optimization

807.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Vimacare.com main page is 873.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 797.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 287 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 752 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 287 B or 28% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 60.0 kB

  • Original 797.6 kB
  • After minification 737.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vimacare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 74.9 kB
  • After minification 74.8 kB
  • After compression 69.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vimacare. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

vimacare.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

vimacare.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

vimacare.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vimacare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vimacare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vimacare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: