Access vintagebrewingco.com. Vintage Brewing Company

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

vintagebrewingco.com

128 ms

vintagebrewingco.com

250 ms

vintagebrewingcompany.com

337 ms

style.min.css

65 ms

wpbaw-public.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Vintagebrewingco.com, 84% (26 requests) were made to Vintagebrewingcompany.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (449 ms) relates to the external source Vintagebrewingcompany.com.

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Vintagebrewingco.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 50.0 kB

Original 63.0 kB
After minification 62.6 kB
After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 928.7 kB

Original 1.4 MB
After minification 506.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vintage Brewing Co needs image optimization as it can save up to 928.7 kB or 65% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 64.1 kB

Original 398.9 kB
After minification 398.9 kB
After compression 334.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 55.1 kB

Original 222.6 kB
After minification 222.6 kB
After compression 167.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vintagebrewingco.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vintage Brewing Co. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.