Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

visionsign.net

Custom Signs Virginia, Washington DC, Maryland, West Virginia, VA, DC, MD, WV

Page Load Speed

21.8 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

21.6 sec

Page Rendered

158 ms

About Website

Visit visionsign.net now to see the best up-to-date Visionsign content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about visionsign.net

Custom signs, vehicle graphics and vehicle wraps are just a few of our specialties. With over 25 years of design experience, Vision Sign is one of the best graphics advertising, marketing and branding...

Visit visionsign.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Visionsign.net page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 21.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

visionsign.net performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,110 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.224

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visionsign.net

48 ms

www.visionsign.net

2418 ms

css2

43 ms

js

64 ms

dashicons.min.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Visionsign.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Visionsign.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 166.5 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Visionsign.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 687.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 58.4 kB

  • Original 72.9 kB
  • After minification 71.2 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 42.4 kB

  • Original 687.0 kB
  • After minification 644.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Visionsign images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 323.7 kB
  • After minification 323.7 kB
  • After compression 313.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 55.2 kB

  • Original 121.2 kB
  • After minification 116.3 kB
  • After compression 66.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visionsign.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 46% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (52%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visionsign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

visionsign.net accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

visionsign.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

visionsign.net SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visionsign.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visionsign.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Visionsign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: