Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

vividlite.com

VividLite

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

489 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

About Website

Visit vividlite.com now to see the best up-to-date Vivid Lite content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vividlite.com

TAKE CONTROL OF COLOR. THE MOST VERSATILE WIRELESS SMART LIGHTS. ANYTIME. ANYWHERE.

Visit vividlite.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vividlite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 489 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vividlite.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vividlite.com

489 ms

preloads.js

53 ms

features-1c0b396bd4d054b94abae1eb6a1bd6ba47beb35525c57a217c77a862ff06d83f.js

23 ms

klaviyo.js

314 ms

shopify-perf-kit-1.0.0.min.js

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 150 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (135 requests) were addressed to the original Vividlite.com, 3% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Vividlite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 384.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vividlite.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 179.1 kB

  • Original 231.5 kB
  • After minification 215.0 kB
  • After compression 52.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 194.7 kB

  • Original 3.5 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vivid Lite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 217.1 kB
  • After minification 217.1 kB
  • After compression 209.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 54.4 kB
  • After minification 54.4 kB
  • After compression 50.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vividlite.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (72%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivid Lite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

vividlite.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

vividlite.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

vividlite.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vividlite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vividlite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vivid Lite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: