Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

vivo.tech

Conference Room Audio Video Solutions | Vivo Technologies

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

766 ms

About Website

Welcome to vivo.tech homepage info - get ready to check Vivo best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about vivo.tech

Modernizing your conference room? Partner with an integrator that understands unified communications. Contact Vivo for your audio video solutions.

Visit vivo.tech

Key Findings

We analyzed Vivo.tech page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vivo.tech performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,430 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.245

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vivo.tech

100 ms

css-vars-ponyfill@2

48 ms

preloads.js

47 ms

load_feature-87876fa245af19cbd14aa886ed59c6aa8a27c45d24dcd7a81cf2d2323506233e.js

66 ms

theme.css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Vivo.tech, 8% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (440 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 557.4 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

570.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vivo.tech main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 569.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 479.6 kB

  • Original 569.8 kB
  • After minification 545.8 kB
  • After compression 90.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 479.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5.0 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vivo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 64.2 kB

  • Original 494.0 kB
  • After minification 481.6 kB
  • After compression 429.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 58.6 kB
  • After minification 58.6 kB
  • After compression 45.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivo.tech needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (84%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

vivo.tech accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vivo.tech best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vivo.tech SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivo.tech can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivo.tech main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vivo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: