Access 3060writingfordigitalmedia.wordpress.com. OLD Writing for Digital Media « MTSU EMC 3060

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

3060writingfordigitalmedia.wordpress.com

7 ms

3060writingfordigitalmedia.wordpress.com

2895 ms

jetpack-likes.css

79 ms

style.css

86 ms

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original 3060writingfordigitalmedia.wordpress.com, 30% (9 requests) were made to S0.wp.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain 3060writingfordigitalmedia.wordpress.com.

Content Size

275.2 kB

After Optimization

209.2 kB

In fact, the total size of 3060writingfordigitalmedia.wordpress.com main page is 275.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 87.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 63.8 kB

Original 83.6 kB
After minification 82.0 kB
After compression 19.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 886 B

Original 45.5 kB
After minification 44.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 3060 Writing For Digital Media Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 931 B

Original 87.6 kB
After minification 87.6 kB
After compression 86.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 461 B

Original 58.5 kB
After minification 58.5 kB
After compression 58.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 3060writingfordigitalmedia.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 3060 Writing For Digital Media Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.