Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

player.webvideocore.net

Streaming Video Hosting and Live Video Streaming Services

Page Load Speed

22 sec in total

First Response

82 ms

Resources Loaded

20.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Player Web Video Core content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about player.webvideocore.net

Deliver your videos and live streams worldwide without buffering. Monetize without commission, pull insights from Deep Analytics, protect your content and more.

Visit player.webvideocore.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Player.webvideocore.net page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 21.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

player.webvideocore.net performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.463

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.streamingvideoprovider.com

82 ms

gtm.js

79 ms

main-old-7f06883a80.css

43 ms

logo.png

25 ms

dplayer.js

19747 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Player.webvideocore.net, 16% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.7 sec) relates to the external source Play.streamingvideoprovider.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (59%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

710.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Player.webvideocore.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 857.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 532.9 kB

  • Original 857.9 kB
  • After minification 857.4 kB
  • After compression 325.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 532.9 kB or 62% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 69.4 kB
  • After minification 69.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Player Web Video Core images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 25.4 kB

  • Original 32.7 kB
  • After minification 32.6 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 466.5 kB

  • Original 775.6 kB
  • After minification 775.6 kB
  • After compression 309.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Player.webvideocore.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 466.5 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Player Web Video Core. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

player.webvideocore.net accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

player.webvideocore.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

player.webvideocore.net SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Player.webvideocore.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Player.webvideocore.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Player Web Video Core. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: