Access w-ils.org. WILS - Solutions for Independent Living

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

25/100

10%

w-ils.org

112 ms

w-ils.org

402 ms

a9547bcb_ai1ec_parsed_css.css

214 ms

style.min.css

156 ms

gb-editor-fixes.css

155 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original W-ils.org, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (741 ms) belongs to the original domain W-ils.org.

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

847.9 kB

In fact, the total size of W-ils.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 701.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 91.6 kB

Original 125.8 kB
After minification 124.6 kB
After compression 34.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 89.4 kB

Original 701.8 kB
After minification 612.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, WILS needs image optimization as it can save up to 89.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

Original 73.8 kB
After minification 73.8 kB
After compression 70.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

Original 144.1 kB
After minification 144.1 kB
After compression 130.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. W-ils.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WILS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.