Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

walkingchat.net

金沙集团1755app下载|首頁|歡迎您

Page Load Speed

19.5 sec in total

First Response

2.6 sec

Resources Loaded

16.8 sec

Page Rendered

131 ms

About Website

Visit walkingchat.net now to see the best up-to-date Walkingchat content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about walkingchat.net

金沙集团1755app下载赌场于2022年3月29日开幕，总投资逾2.4亿美元，现时已成为澳门最大的娱乐场。

Visit walkingchat.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Walkingchat.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 16.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

walkingchat.net performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.031

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

walkingchat.net

2559 ms

www.walkingchat.net

734 ms

jquery.20.min.js

67 ms

style.css

3148 ms

jquery.js

4215 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Walkingchat.net, 44% (12 requests) were made to Czsblhb.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.1 sec) relates to the external source Czsblhb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Walkingchat.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 15.7 kB

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 40.6 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Walkingchat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 364 B

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 364 B or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (36%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Walkingchat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

walkingchat.net accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

walkingchat.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

walkingchat.net SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Walkingchat.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Walkingchat.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Walkingchat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: